- From: Charles (Chuck) Oppermann <chuckop@MICROSOFT.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 09:36:19 -0700
- To: cltrar@login.dknet.dk, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Trying to navigate the web using a insertion point (IP) like in a word processor or other text editor is very difficult. You can try this by using Microsoft Word - it has a built in web browser. Some screen readers provide a "virtual" insertion point that allows you to perform the same functionality as if the browser exposed this. Charles Oppermann Program Manager, Active Accessibility, Microsoft Corporation mailto:chuckop@microsoft.com http://microsoft.com/enable/ "A computer on every desk and in every home, usable by everyone!" -----Original Message----- From: cltrar@login.dknet.dk [mailto:cltrar@login.dknet.dk] Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 1998 2:34 PM To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org Subject: basic question regarding ua and braille Hi, I would like to know if the problems posed by using a browser only with a braille display for output, has been considered earlier in the work of this group? As I see it the basic requirement for using a UA with braille only is that you have a cursor that you can move around in the document. In this way it becomes possible to clip text from the page that you display to the clipboard when In a Windows invironment using the standard cut copy and paste keyboard shortcuts. As most browsers are today it seems as if you only get a focus that you can move among links and form controls, but not a cursor that you can move around the rest of the contents in the browser. With a "real" cursor (I have no better technical term for this) you will also be able to move around in the document a lot easier than it is today. This assumes that the dependent technology you are using can move the cursor when you pan through a document. I do not know if this ability is a standard for different dependent technology, but I know that JFW uses this technique. Regards Claus Thøgersen
Received on Friday, 25 September 1998 12:36:25 UTC