- From: Scott Luebking <phoenixl@netcom.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 1998 11:58:50 -0800 (PST)
- To: phoenixl@netcom.com, poehlman@clark.net
- Cc: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org, w3c-wai-ui@w3.org
Hi, I disagree with your point for a couple of reasons. First, how much work will the developer have to go through to write and debug the code to use the information provided by the browser? This may or not may be trivial. My other concern is what are the advantages to the blind user to have the feature provided by the screen access technology versus the browser? I might be wrong about this, but I don't believe that the blind browser user will want the browser functionality changed out from under them each time they switch screen reader. Do you think that blind users want this? Scott > your statement about screenreader developpers duplicating each others work > may make the last point moot because if the browser provides the propper > information to the third party device, the only thing the third party > device needs to do is be sure to take advantage of it. perhaps we need to > develop annother third party device to go between but that may be a topic > for another time and annother list. > I'd say the strongest case can be made for features that can benefit all. > I'd also say that many features benefitting one using a screenreader can > probably benefit all even if that eans that the feature need be adapted to > fit annother catagory.
Received on Wednesday, 11 March 1998 14:58:58 UTC