- From: Adam Cooper <cooperad@bigpond.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2026 09:21:27 +1000
- To: "'BrianD'" <lists@briandalton.org>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <000001dcd50a$3e8fe840$bbafb8c0$@bigpond.com>
Putting aside whether it fails WCAG for a moment, there are simple steps that can be taken to alleviate some of the problems people using WHCM encounter. For example: * Not using CSS background-color or background-image (e.g., for radio button selection indication) * Not using colour as the only mechanism to convey information * Using secondary focus indication mechanisms that show in WHCM * using the border property on buttons and fields even if set to transparent These are easy to achieve if not using a point and click black box platform. From: BrianD <lists@briandalton.org> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2026 7:00 PM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Windows high contrast mode. Hi to all. I've been asked to research if windows high contrast mode, that is altered in the windows settings, touches off a specific WCAG success criterion? If something fails under windows high contrast mode conditions, is it a bug or a best practise? Any research I've seen, states that if something fails when this feature is activated, it can fail against many different SC such as: 1.4.1, 1.4.3, 1.4.11, and 1.4.7. Have you found that to be the case? Or have you come across any resources that say a specific success criterion covers it. Any blogs, links or articles you've come across would be helpful here. Thanks in advance. Best wishes, Brian Dalton.
Received on Saturday, 25 April 2026 23:21:17 UTC