- From: Adam Cooper <cooperad@bigpond.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 11:49:31 +1000
- To: "'Steve Green'" <steve.green@testpartners.co.uk>, "'Mark Magennis'" <Mark.Magennis@skillsoft.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 27 June 2025 01:49:40 UTC
If time limit was normatively defined, I might be inclined to agree, but it isn't so as I said earlier I can see no embargo on items being removed from view automatically once their content has been conveyed . and page load to change content is hopefully a bit of a legacy issue, isn't it? From: Steve Green <steve.green@testpartners.co.uk> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 6:49 PM To: Mark Magennis <Mark.Magennis@skillsoft.com>; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: RE: A question about immediate feedback I agree about it being a clear violation of 2.2.1 if the messages automatically disappear after a period of time except in the circumstances you describe or if a page reload occurs. Steve From: Mark Magennis <Mark.Magennis@skillsoft.com> Sent: 26 June 2025 09:38 To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Re: A question about immediate feedback Adam Cooper said: "It should be onscreen for as long as you believe it is necessary for everybody to consume its content and then disappear." Adam, I would have thought that automatically disappearing toast notifications are a violation of 2.2.1 Timing Adjustable. Unless they disappear when they are no longer valid or one of the other mechanisms (turn off, adjust, extend) are implemented. Interested to hear your view on this. Mark
Received on Friday, 27 June 2025 01:49:40 UTC