Hi Linda,
Tossing my thoughts in here.
My vote is yes.
access is about insuring the paths to content is as inclusive as
possible. That also means where the freedom to choose how one reaches that
content is concerned.
I will add that for some disability embodiment, one might only have app
related access desires met.
Say the site does not respond to voice browsers for example because it is
not based on progressive enhancement.
A company can in theory only dictate the door used if they are also
providing the keys for that different door. by which I mean supplying the
technology and insuring equatable access in that fashion.
Does that resonate?
Its not about this door or that door, its about this door and that door.
Karen
On Tue, 23 May 2023, Linda Noble wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
> I can’t find this information in the W3C site or elsewhere. If a public
> company has a 508-compliant desktop site, and an app that isn’t, are they
> out of compliance? The app doesn’t have all the features of the desktop
> site.
>
> Regards,
>
> Linda
>