- From: Kelly Childs <kelly@beaccessible.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 09:27:54 -0600
- Cc: Linda Noble <lindaanoble@gmail.com>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAFAfVhLE5AS0qrNsFWH6Sw3AF1uk4UVAQ1_+MmH8upjfyTS3HQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Linda, I recommend referring to the Section 508 website. This may help: Section 508 - Mobile Application <https://www.section508.gov/sample-procurement/mobile-application/>. In my experience, if it is a service or product that is being offered by the agency, then yes, it must be accessible. Hope this helps! Kelly On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 9:21 AM Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net> wrote: > Hi Linda, > Tossing my thoughts in here. > My vote is yes. > access is about insuring the paths to content is as inclusive as > possible. That also means where the freedom to choose how one reaches > that > content is concerned. > I will add that for some disability embodiment, one might only have app > related access desires met. > Say the site does not respond to voice browsers for example because it is > not based on progressive enhancement. > A company can in theory only dictate the door used if they are also > providing the keys for that different door. by which I mean supplying the > technology and insuring equatable access in that fashion. > Does that resonate? > Its not about this door or that door, its about this door and that door. > Karen > > > > On Tue, 23 May 2023, Linda Noble wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > > > I can’t find this information in the W3C site or elsewhere. If a public > > company has a 508-compliant desktop site, and an app that isn’t, are they > > out of compliance? The app doesn’t have all the features of the desktop > > site. > > > > Regards, > > > > Linda > >
Received on Thursday, 25 May 2023 15:28:12 UTC