- From: Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 21:18:16 -0500
- To: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
- Cc: W3C WAI ig <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAEy-OxHkxBPDZgTQ5pxASL1jrEXTrsz=HY8_gNarrGmwcWNVQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Great news Wayne! Thanks for sharing this! On Sun, Feb 13, 2022, 2:38 PM Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com> wrote: > Reading with partial sight: > I think Microsoft Word has quietly become the best assistive technology > for people with low vision. The text-to-speech reader is excellent, with > speed control and a couple of good voices. What is really great is the way > it reads mathematics. > The math editor is excellent! Most LaTex editors are very hard to use > because the commands are too tiny or too big (taking up half the screen). > With Word, most symbols can be entered from the keyboard using LaTex. > > The text-to speech reads mathematics created in the equation editor as > good or better than a human! It misses symbols you punch in directly. So, > if you insert the code for a set union , "\cup", straight into the doc, it > will print nicely but if your union is not in an equation box the Word > reader skips it. > > However,"\cup" in an equation box reads "union". It really works. I use > the text-to-speech to proof-read proofs. > > Font size is no problem. There is no upper limit. The word styles do what > CSS promised. I advise not changing font family, spacing, or any other > parameters before you get the font size you like with word wrapping. Font > size does not work like zooming a web page. You can make a global change, > but you can vary the size by its semantics. > > It is ironic that a proprietary product of the icon of software monopoly > would come up with a better low vision accomodation than the W3C. > > Beat, Wayne > > >
Received on Monday, 14 February 2022 02:18:42 UTC