- From: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 11:32:00 -0800
- To: W3C WAI ig <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJeQ8SByfw1oBsCBg1zkDJYYTzv+YF+QPzqD0A=mHCn8qwV1bQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reading with partial sight: I think Microsoft Word has quietly become the best assistive technology for people with low vision. The text-to-speech reader is excellent, with speed control and a couple of good voices. What is really great is the way it reads mathematics. The math editor is excellent! Most LaTex editors are very hard to use because the commands are too tiny or too big (taking up half the screen). With Word, most symbols can be entered from the keyboard using LaTex. The text-to speech reads mathematics created in the equation editor as good or better than a human! It misses symbols you punch in directly. So, if you insert the code for a set union , "\cup", straight into the doc, it will print nicely but if your union is not in an equation box the Word reader skips it. However,"\cup" in an equation box reads "union". It really works. I use the text-to-speech to proof-read proofs. Font size is no problem. There is no upper limit. The word styles do what CSS promised. I advise not changing font family, spacing, or any other parameters before you get the font size you like with word wrapping. Font size does not work like zooming a web page. You can make a global change, but you can vary the size by its semantics. It is ironic that a proprietary product of the icon of software monopoly would come up with a better low vision accomodation than the W3C. Beat, Wayne
Received on Sunday, 13 February 2022 19:32:49 UTC