- From: Mike Cleary <mike.cleary@grantsolutions.gov>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 11:21:35 -0400
- To: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com>
- Cc: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANbRX7i6ug44RmbnRizqXoyBKUp=WrEjsBHooxvbBwg8zLkSeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks, that helps. Part of the issue is that I'm dealing with a 508 testing group that takes a maximalist, literal interpretation of 508 guidelines. (They expect color hex codes to be exposed to the user, not just color descriptions, despite the note in SC 1.3.1, for one example.) It makes it a little difficult to maintain a sense of perspective. Mike On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 11:15 PM Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com> wrote: > Hi Mike, there are a few different criteria that come into play here such > as SC 2.4.6 Headings and Labels which indicate that labels (including those > on buttons) need to communicate the topic or purpose. SC 2.4.4 for link > purpose and SC 1.1.1 for non-text content such as the images you bring > up. For links in SC 2.4.4 the SC allows for link purpose to be > communicated in context of the surrounding sentence, paragraph, list item, > table cell, and table cell/header combination. > > > > So, the brief answer is that it depends on the context, other elements, on > the page, groupings/regions, and other factors. It is not a hard rule one > way or the other as there are so many other things that go into making the > determination. There are certainly opportunities to go beyond conformance > is as well and improve use beyond the minimum. On the flip side extra > verbosity can sometimes not be helpful either – but it’s safer than missing > something. > > > > It would be good to built out specific scenarios such as subheadings with > the same text but differentiated by different parent headings that are > unique, etc. and get a consensus among both basic users and experts. > Related to the heading discuss there is a sufficient technique that lean > toward being more verbose in subheadings > https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Techniques/general/G130 > > > > Jonathan > > > > *From:* Mike Cleary <mike.cleary@grantsolutions.gov> > *Sent:* Thursday, June 9, 2022 2:13 PM > *To:* w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > *Subject:* Checking need for unique labels, headers, graphic labels, etc. > > > > *CAUTION:* This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not > click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know > the content is safe. > > > > Hi all, > > I'm looking for guidance about when we need unique button labels, graphic > labels, headers, etc. Our 508 tester flags all the duplicate names she sees > in JAWS lists of buttons, graphics, etc., out of concern that users will > not be able to distinguish between them. I'm afraid we may be going too far > -- or that I don't know enough. > > Unique labels may have some value on form with multiple fields or controls > with the same purpose -- a long unbroken string of "delete buttons," for > example. > > But is this an absolute rule in all cases? Do we need unique subheaders, > even when they mean the same thing and are embedded in different tables > that have their own title headers? > > Do we have to uniquely label all dollar-sign graphics for a financial > table with multiple rows and columns? (Or can we get away with hiding them > all as decorative images?) > > We have forms with buttons with the same names, but lots of buttons in > between, often within a numbered structure of data fields. For example, > Outcome 1, field 1; Outcome 1, field 2, etc.?. Wouldn't that provide > context for occasional identical buttons that fall under different Outcome > numbers? > > > > Please advise! > > > > Mike > > > > -- > > Mike Cleary | Scrum Master > > mike.cleary@grantsolutions.gov > > > > GrantSolutions | 1700 Rockville Pike | Suite 600 | Rockville, MD 20852 > > Office: 703-288-5300 ext.157 >
Received on Friday, 10 June 2022 15:22:00 UTC