- From: Alistair Duggin <alistair.duggin@btinternet.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 18:21:49 +0100
- To: Niklas Pivic <niklas.pivic@tink.com>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2021 17:22:04 UTC
Some details of where contractions can cause issues for readability (not screen reader related) https://readabilityguidelines.co.uk/grammar-points/contractions/ > On 19 Oct 2021, at 08:40, Niklas Pivic <niklas.pivic@tink.com> wrote: > > > Hi! > > I've recently discussed using contractions in technical writing, mainly for user interfaces. > > There's science that supports increased readability when contractions are used: https://twitter.com/FriendlyAshley/status/1450180256694951945 > > Is there anything pointing to the opposite? > > Most technical-writing style guides say contractions should be used, especially when writing in a friendly voice. > > Modern screen-reading software must surely have no problems with contractions? > > Please let me know if there is any science out there that says contraction shouldn't be used for accessibility purposes. > > Thank you! > > Best regards, > Niklas
Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2021 17:22:04 UTC