- From: Steve Green <steve.green@testpartners.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 10:29:43 +0000
- To: Louise Lister <Louise.Lister@iop.org>, "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AS8PR09MB541927EA149CFAC6DDA0283CC70E9@AS8PR09MB5419.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com>
It depends on what level of accessibility you are aiming for. If you are aiming for WCAG 2.1 level A, then a transcript will meet part of the requirements for synchronised media as long as it contains all important visual information as well as the dialog. However, this is not sufficient to meet level AA unless the video is of a single talking head with nothing important in the visual content. If that exception does not apply, you will need an audio description to meet level AA for synchronised media. If you have audio-only or video-only content, then the transcript (including important audible or visual information as appropriate) is sufficient to meet level A. There is no additional requirement at level AA. The interactive transcript may be adequate, but it depends how it is implemented. Also, it would need to contain all the important audible or visual information as well as the dialog. Steve Green Managing Director Test Partners Ltd From: Louise Lister <Louise.Lister@iop.org> Sent: 17 June 2021 09:58 To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Do we need a plain video transcript if we have an interactive one? Hello all, I hope you are a having a good week. We are about to start adding transcripts to our embedded videos on our website (hooray), and I had a little question. For now, we are looking to add a plain text transcript, but if at some point we had the ability to include an interactive transcript, would that then cover the transcript requirement from an accessibility requirement, and we could dispense with the plain text transcript? I can see the benefits of both types, and whilst I love the interactive transcripts that TEDx use (fab talk: https://www.ted.com/talks/chieko_asakawa_how_new_technology_helps_blind_people_explore_the_world/transcript), I can only assume they’re using a specific software platform which wouldn’t be an option for us. With kind regards Louise ________________________________ This email (and attachments) are confidential and intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient please immediately notify the sender, permanently and securely delete any copies and do not take action with it or in reliance on it. Any views expressed are the author's and do not represent those of IOP, except where specifically stated. IOP takes reasonable precautions to protect against viruses but accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from virus infection. For the protection of IOP's systems and staff emails are scanned automatically.. Institute of Physics. Registered charity no. 293851 (England & Wales) and SCO40092 (Scotland) Registered Office: 37 Caledonian Road, London, N1 9BU<https://goo.gl/maps/DUHbKcbzuUN2> Your privacy is important to us. For information about how IOP uses your personal data, please see our Privacy Policy<https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.iop.org%2Fprivacy%2Findex.html&data=02%7C01%7C%7C6716aa3c6fd84da5102808d5c0b234a0%7Cf9ee42e6bad04e639115f704f9ccceed%7C0%7C0%7C636626793962820374&sdata=RI6OT4MumRlklNzF5i2M9ZxS6P%2FxxLg%2FJwcnMJ%2B0480%3D&reserved=0> ________________________________
Received on Thursday, 17 June 2021 10:30:22 UTC