- From: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 07:39:44 -0400
- To: Louise Lister <Louise.Lister@iop.org>
- Cc: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFmg2sU9vWZKRJ4qhPQ+t=0LxbkwKgjPvSbTWn_k+Wnir-tPVw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Louise, While definitely not "gospel", I for one would find this acceptable, as in your context "below" is effectively synonymous with "later in the document", which is both accurate and true. While I am not a daily screen reader, I nonetheless find this acceptable in 'spirit': the user-experience for daily screen reader users is essentially linear/vertical - what I've heard, what I am hearing, and what I've yet to hear. 3 dimensional references (i.e. "to the left", "to the right", "next to") is where you start getting into confusion/issues. My personal $0.02 FWIW. JF On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 6:55 AM Louise Lister <Louise.Lister@iop.org> wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > I hope that you are all having good weather wherever you are! > > > > I’ve just been reviewing our website for over reliance on visual > characteristics (shape, size, colour, position) and noticed that we use the > term ‘below’ a bit. > > > > For example: > > > > “Please see below a list of …” > > “See guidance notes below” > > > > Can someone tell me if the use of the word ‘below’ equals an over reliance > on ‘position’, and would fail a WCAG check? I’m hoping this is okay as > there’s may not be a succinct alternative. > > > > Thank you for your help! > > > > Kind regards > > Louise > > > ------------------------------ > This email (and attachments) are confidential and intended for the > addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient please immediately > notify the sender, permanently and securely delete any copies and do not > take action with it or in reliance on it. Any views expressed are the > author's and do not represent those of IOP, except where specifically > stated. IOP takes reasonable precautions to protect against viruses but > accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from virus infection. > For the protection of IOP's systems and staff emails are scanned > automatically.. > > Institute of Physics. Registered charity no. 293851 (England & Wales) and > SCO40092 (Scotland) > Registered Office: 37 Caledonian Road, London, N1 9BU > <https://goo.gl/maps/DUHbKcbzuUN2> > > Your privacy is important to us. For information about how IOP uses your > personal data, please see our Privacy Policy > <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.iop.org%2Fprivacy%2Findex.html&data=02%7C01%7C%7C6716aa3c6fd84da5102808d5c0b234a0%7Cf9ee42e6bad04e639115f704f9ccceed%7C0%7C0%7C636626793962820374&sdata=RI6OT4MumRlklNzF5i2M9ZxS6P%2FxxLg%2FJwcnMJ%2B0480%3D&reserved=0> > > ------------------------------ > -- *John Foliot* | Senior Industry Specialist, Digital Accessibility "I made this so long because I did not have time to make it shorter." - Pascal "links go places, buttons do things"
Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2021 11:41:11 UTC