Re: Using the word 'below' as a visual characteristic

I'd say "below" has generally taken on the meaning/connotation of "following/after this" - so as long as the thing being referred to comes *after* this description in the linear flow of the page/document I'd say it's fine. Same with "above".

P

> On 8 Jun 2021, at 12:06, Louise Lister <Louise.Lister@iop.org> wrote:
> 
>  
> 
> Hello all,
>  
> I hope that you are all having good weather wherever you are!
>  
> I’ve just been reviewing our website for over reliance on visual characteristics (shape, size, colour, position) and noticed that we use the term ‘below’ a bit.
>  
> For example:
>  
> “Please see below a list of …”
> “See guidance notes below”
>  
> Can someone tell me if the use of the word ‘below’ equals an over reliance on ‘position’, and would fail a WCAG check? I’m hoping this is okay as there’s may not be a succinct alternative.
>  
> Thank you for your help!
>  
> Kind regards
> Louise
> 
> 
> This email (and attachments) are confidential and intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient please immediately notify the sender, permanently and securely delete any copies and do not take action with it or in reliance on it. Any views expressed are the author's and do not represent those of IOP, except where specifically stated. IOP takes reasonable precautions to protect against viruses but accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from virus infection. For the protection of IOP's systems and staff emails are scanned automatically..  
> 
> Institute of Physics. Registered charity no. 293851 (England & Wales) and SCO40092 (Scotland)
> Registered Office:  37 Caledonian Road, London, N1 9BU
> Your privacy is important to us. For information about how IOP uses your personal data, please see our Privacy Policy