- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:34:14 +0000
- To: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
- CC: W3C WAI ig <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 11 September 2020 12:34:31 UTC
Coming to this late, but there is a useful bookmarklet called “Kill Sticky headers”: https://alisdair.mcdiarmid.org/kill-sticky-headers/ It’s a work-around, if you do need something in the sticky (like the menu), you’ll probably have to refresh the page. It is a known issue, in a WCAG 2.x context it’s quite hard to define ‘too big’ across the diversity of scenarios on the web. However, it’s something that might fit Silver (WCAG 3.0) better, which will take a more nuanced view on testing. Cheers, -Alastair From: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com> Sent: 28 August 2020 02:13 To: W3C WAI ig <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Subject: Reflow The web has definitely gotten better. Lots of sites have gotten the reflow idea well. My biggest problem is fixed position elements. Many sites reflow really well, but after the fixed elements take up their space, there are only one or two lines of main content left. The problem with fixed position elements is they zoom up 400% too. Even those buttons that jump you to the top get very big. It seems to be prevalent. Anyone else noticed that. Here is a really terrible site: https://www.csulb.edu/ Best, Wayne
Received on Friday, 11 September 2020 12:34:31 UTC