- From: Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net>
- Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 18:03:30 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- cc: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1909091801270.23687@server2.shellworld.net>
Yes, very much indeed. although it does not seem to address a common argument to using anything but an image verification, that being site security. Will check out the notes though as I dare say they speak to this. Cheers, Karen On Mon, 9 Sep 2019, Shawn Henry wrote: > Hi Karen, > > Inaccessibility of CAPTCHA: Alternatives to Visual Turing Tests on the Web > W3C Working Group Note > 23 August 2019 > https://www.w3.org/TR/turingtest/ > > "2.1.3 Logic Puzzles > ... Simple mathematical or word puzzles ... > ...The use of logic puzzles as a CAPTCHA technique, however, introduces > substantial barriers to access for people with language, learning or > cognitive disabilities. An individual with dyscalculia will understandably > find even simple arithmetic puzzles challenging. ... > " > -- https://www.w3.org/TR/turingtest/#logic-puzzles > > Hope that helps. > > Best, > ~ Shawn > <http://www.w3.org/People/Shawn/> > > > On 9/9/2019 4:10 PM, Karen Lewellen wrote: >> Hi all, >> I am currently involved in a discussion on the Google accessibility list >> regarding the use of math problems as a form of captcha. the individual >> is stating that such a substitution carries no security whatsoever. >> Given the places where I have personally, and thankfully found the math >> problem verification present, I am wanting to share the recent w3c >> information on their use. >> Can anyone give me a simple link to a relevant section, or share an >> article discussing math problems as captcha challenges with their pros / >> cons? >> Thanks, >> Karen >> >> > > >
Received on Monday, 9 September 2019 22:04:12 UTC