- From: Jan Hellbusch <jan@hellbusch.de>
- Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 17:40:38 +0200
- To: "'Lisa Louise Davis \(Aquent LLC\)'" <v-lidav@microsoft.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2019 15:41:03 UTC
> Is there any kind of landmark failure that you'd consider a hard WCAG failure? * Incorrect markup would be something like coding a navigation bar as <main> or using <header> for content, where the actual header (<h1> ...) is somewhere else. * Using more than one <header> and/or <footer> for a sectioning or root element. Besides that, there are a couple of other issues, which may cause problems, but are not necessarily violations: * unnecessary nesting, e.g. <nav><nav> ... list of links ... </nav></nav> * Identical labelling or not labelling identical elements (mostly <nav> and <aside>). There may be exceptions when two or more regions contain identical content. * I would also consider omitting content from any region a problem in certain situations. All content should be contained in a region. There may be exceptions. Jan -- Hellbusch Accessibility Consulting Chemnitzer Str. 50, 44139 Dortmund Tel.: +49 (231) 58054815 Mobil: +49 (163) 3369925 -- Accessibility-Consulting seit 2000 Leistungen, Bücher, Artikel: https://www.barrierefreies-webdesign.de Blog: https://www.hellbusch.de
Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2019 15:41:03 UTC