- From: Chaals Nevile <chaals@yandex.ru>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 01:01:25 +0200
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 21:40:11 +0200, Tobias Bengfort <tobias.bengfort@posteo.de> wrote: > I think a major issue with user stylesheets is that there are no stable > CSS-APIs that you could work against. A user-stylesheet is basically a > monkey-patch that will break on a regular basis. > > In order to get this working reliably we would have to convince authors > to trat their CSS as a public interface and announce breaking changes > early on. I am not sure this reasonable. We would. But in a world of CSS preprocessors and so on, it is possibly easier than it might seem. cheers > tobias > > > On 18/07/18 01:50, Wayne Dick wrote: >> There are lots of people who claim to be accessibility experts who >> disregard the value of user stylesheets as a significant technology to >> mitigate problems of visual interface. Actually they work quite well. >> >> This technology is used primarily be people who are left out of the >> mainstream ATs. They are a way to change colors, ensure a personalized >> contrast ration, control column width and many other things. >> >> I use Safari because the browser will host user stylesheets. It is too >> bad >> that other browsers decided to stop supporting this important assistive >> technology. >> >> I think the AG should at least recognize that this is a form of >> assistive >> technology that is available in a technology landscape that offers >> almost >> nothing useful for most people with low vision and cognitive >> disabilities. >> >> For those who want to tell me how wonderful screen magnifiers are if I >> just >> used them correctly, don't bother. I probably know how to use them >> better >> than you. For my needs, screen magnification scores zero. >> >> Wayne Dick >> > -- Chaals: Charles (McCathie) Nevile find more at https://yandex.com Using Opera's long-abandoned mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ Is there really still nothing better?
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2018 23:02:01 UTC