- From: Michael A. Peters <mpeters@domblogger.net>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 12:28:52 -0800
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On 01/04/2018 05:12 PM, Michael A. Peters wrote: > On 01/04/2018 02:07 PM, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: >> On 04/01/2018 21:41, Phill Jenkins wrote: >>> I agree it honestly seems like responsive design is the wild wild west >>> where for many developers, all that matters is that it works for their >>> eyes on the devices they happen to own - like guidelines and training >>> are going to fix that . . . >> >> As for the developer bashing bit, maybe also consider that these >> developers were aiming to ensure content fits/adapts to whatever the >> user's browser/viewport width is, rather than forcing the user to scroll >> horizontally and vertically. So not so much a "they don't care/it's the >> wild west", but rather "their aim works for certain users, but doesn't >> work for me/match my preference". >> >> P > > Using device width they can make sure it doesn't scroll except when the > user chooses to zoom in past the device width. The more I think about this the more I think it is on the client to provide a means for those of us who want to keep CSS px width static when we zoom to do so. Maybe a FireFox extension could (or does ??) provide this? That would solve the problem.
Received on Friday, 5 January 2018 20:29:19 UTC