W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2018

RE: responsive design and breakpoints and layout changes

From: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 22:52:14 +0000
To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BN6PR03MB25133E8CBF8D4525C1A40415F11F0@BN6PR03MB2513.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
> preference".

One person's preference might be another person's barrier to access.  But at some point both approaches are reasonable -- but there needs to be a way either via the user agent or content author to allow users to use reflow but also see the content.  

An example is a common collaboration tool that I use.  When I zoom in to see the content in the middle the margins increase and the side content stays or grows larger to keep it readable.  This causes the content in the middle I wanted to see to shrink.  Often I end up zooming out to 70 percent to make the content in the middle get larger.  Zooming out to make content larger seems odd but I found it often works for certain regions of the screen -- obviously other content such as the text on the sides gets smaller.

Jonathan

Jonathan Avila
Chief Accessibility Officer
Level Access, inc. (formerly SSB BART Group, inc.)
(703) 637-8957
Jon.avila@levelaccess.com
Visit us online: Website | Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn | Blog
Looking to boost your accessibility knowledge? Check out our free webinars!

The information contained in this transmission may be attorney privileged and/or confidential information intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.

-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick H. Lauke [mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk] 
Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 5:07 PM
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Subject: Re: responsive design and breakpoints and layout changes

On 04/01/2018 21:41, Phill Jenkins wrote:
> I agree it honestly
> seems like responsive design is the wild wild west where for many 
> developers, all that matters is that it works for their eyes on the 
> devices they happen to own - like guidelines and training are going to 
> fix that . . .

As for the developer bashing bit, maybe also consider that these developers were aiming to ensure content fits/adapts to whatever the user's browser/viewport width is, rather than forcing the user to scroll horizontally and vertically. So not so much a "they don't care/it's the wild west", but rather "their aim works for certain users, but doesn't work for me/match my preference".

P
--
Patrick H. Lauke

www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com

twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

Received on Thursday, 4 January 2018 22:52:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 4 January 2018 22:52:46 UTC