- From: Matt King <a11ythinker@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 13:22:07 -0800
- To: "'Patrick H. Lauke'" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
BTW, we have a breadcrumb pattern in the ARIA Authoring Practicess: http://w3c.github.io/aria-practices/#breadcrumb Matt King -----Original Message----- From: Patrick H. Lauke [mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk] Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 2:09 AM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Re: [breadcrumbs] best practice On 17/11/2017 09:43, Harry Loots wrote: > Hi all > what is the current thinking on breadcrumbs. > > I have a situation where a client want to display the page name in the > breadcrumb, then repeat the page name immediately afterwards as a > heading, which I know can be a nuisance for text-to-speech users. I'd say across all the things that can be problematic/nuisance on web pages, that's a pretty minor thing. I'd further argue that even if the text is repeated, it does serve two separate purposes: in the breadcrumb navigation, to indicate this is the current page; as a heading, to, well, act as heading for the actual page's content. In short, don't think it's an actual problem. > Are their any firm rules on breadcrumbs, or strong views for that > matter :) No firm rules, as with most things in accessibility *grin* And as is often the case, it'll depend on the specific situation (i.e. how is the breadcrumb actually marked up? how long are these page titles - a few words, or as long as a whole sentence - etc). P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Friday, 17 November 2017 21:22:32 UTC