- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 12:26:41 -0400
- To: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Cc: w3c WAI List <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAdDpDYJ1+Cb7dwSYRr3ULjYUpCwZV1PF-+jA7xOyA61v+MNTA@mail.gmail.com>
That was a simply brilliant response Chaals... Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 7:05 AM, David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk> wrote: > On 06/09/17 06:21, Sean Murphy (seanmmur) wrote: > >> This is a long shot and just a thought. Does anyone know if W3C standards >> or the browser vendors are going to expand the current default UI elements >> from the current one’s? My thinking is including a menu, treeview, slider, >> toolbar, etc.? >> >> > HTML has not been controlled by W3C for many years now. > > My reading of the philosophy at the time they lost control is that most of > these are presentational variations on HTML lists, so should not be > reflected in HTML. > > Whilst WHATWG seems to see HTML as a GUI platform, rather than a document > markup language, the issue they might have is that one of their primary > tenets is that pages (whether compliant or not) should look and behave the > same on all browsers. That would mean that such controls would need to > replace any similar controls provided by the underlying GUI platform. > > >
Received on Wednesday, 6 September 2017 16:27:05 UTC