- From: Michael A. Peters <mpeters@domblogger.net>
- Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 07:59:04 -0700
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Yes, the SIL license is a good one. One of the problems with many webfonts (e.g. google fonts, myfonts) is they require you embed a third party resource in the website for them to work. This third party resource often includes a tracking cookie. Accessibility solutions should never involve third party trackers, because users who want privacy (e.g. via Privacy Badger) that block third party trackers should not have reduced accessibility as a result. SIL license is a very good license in that respect. On 05/05/2017 05:16 AM, Elizabeth Pyatt wrote: > FYI - Another font I like is Andika from SIL.org > http://software.sil.org/andika/ > > It’s designed for learners new to reading and is also optimized multiple languages (e.g. Spanish, French, Russian…). It’s under their open font license, and it does include a WOFF web font file. > > It has a lot of the same design characteristics recommended by the British Dyslexia Association (https://bdatech.org/what-technology/typefaces-for-dyslexia/) > > Elizabeth > > >> On May 5, 2017, at 2:13 AM, Michael A. Peters <mpeters@domblogger.net> wrote: >> >> On 05/03/2017 06:07 AM, Sandra Evans wrote: >>> Hi Brian >>> >>> Can you provide some examples of the fonts you are referring to? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Sandra >> >> When I looked at licensing fonts for dyslexia for use as webfonts it seemed that many of them either could not be licensed or were too expensive for me. >> >> I did find a font that was not created specifically for dyslexia but to me anyway appeared to have many characteristics of fonts that were created for dyslexia. >> >> It's called Cyntho Pro. >> >> https://www.youworkforthem.com/font/T4888/cyntho-pro/ >> >> It is a very clean sans-serif font. >> >> I am not dyslexic but I have found it is easier for me to read when that is the font used for the main content. >> >> -=- >> Unfortunately my own personal disability involves memory issues from head injuries (epilepsy) and I don't recall the characteristics I looked for, but when I was looking for a dyslexia font and saw I either could not license the tested fonts for the web or saw that they were way too expensive to license, but I do remember there are certain letters where you need to check the characteristics of the shapes. >> >> I think p and q and b and d were two of them but I don't remember what the characteristics to check for were, and there were some other letters where characteristic of the shape matters. >> >> Also the font I linked has not been tested for the purpose and I can't afford to pay to have it tested for that purpose. So I hope it works but I can not say that it does. >> >> Also also, it seems there are several different types of dyslexia and what works for some does not work for others. >> >> A lot of dyslexic say Comic Sans MS is a free font that works well for them, but a friend of mine who is dyslexic says that font doesn't help her personally. And it also isn't as free as some seem to think. It isn't available (legally) as a system font on Linux and it can't (legally) be used as a webfont. >> >> Interestingly she likes the old Apple font Monaco even though it is monospace. >> > > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > Elizabeth J. Pyatt, Ph.D. > Accessibility IT Consultant > Teaching and Learning with Technology > Penn State University > ejp10@psu.edu, (814) 865-0805 or (814) 865-2030 (Main Office) > > The 300 Building > 304 West College Avenue > University Park, PA 16801 > http://accessibility.psu.edu > >
Received on Friday, 5 May 2017 14:59:35 UTC