- From: Matthieu Faure <ml@Open-S.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:19:40 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5270B30C.8030006@Open-S.com>
Thank you very much for your answers ! Matthieu Le 29/10/2013 20:55, Foliot, John a écrit : > > +1 to Andrew. > > I get concerned whenever a hack or reliance on a bug is used to meet > “success” – it might work today, this month, and maybe even this year, > but experience has shown me that relying on a bug is a recipe for > problems down the road. While WCAG 2 no longer has a mandate to > produce conformant code (i.e. valid per the W3C validator), this is > invalid code, so we cannot be sure that it will work across all > browsers nor all browsers + AT configurations (as Andrew notes). > > I personally would even go so far as to suggest that any Technique > that also fails W3C validation should not be included in the WCAG > Techniques document – it is happy circumstance and nothing more. > > JF > > *From:*Andrew Kirkpatrick [mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 29, 2013 12:13 PM > *To:* Matthieu Faure; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > *Subject:* RE: Technique H25 / real life > > Matthieu, > > According to the test procedure for H25 putting the title in the body > would fail H25. > > However, then the question is if you meet 2.4.2 or not. You can meet > a success criteria without meeting a specific technique. In this > case, it is nice that some user agents support adding the title to the > DOM and displaying the text in the window title, but given the number > of assistive technologies out there that also need to be tested to see > if this completely non-standard way of handling the title work as > desired, I’d far rather see the title element just used correctly. > > AWK > > *From:*Matthieu Faure [mailto:ml@Open-S.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 29, 2013 2:51 PM > *To:* w3c-wai-ig@w3.org <mailto:w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> > *Subject:* Technique H25 / real life > > Hello accessibility enthusiasts, > > I would like to have your opinion about the following point related to > technique H25 <http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG-TECHS/H25.html>. > > The "procedure" section asks to look for the title element in the head > section. From a strict point of view, if a title is in the body, this > technique should be failed. *But*, in such a case, browsers (at least > Firefox, Opera and Chromium) do catch the title and present it to the > user. > > That being said, from your point of view, is technique H25 still failed ? > > Thank you for your answers ! > Matthieu > > -- > Phone: +33 9 72 11 26 06 > Mobile: +33 6 73 96 79 59 > Twitter: @mfaure <http://twitter.com/mfaure> > > Tanaguru free-libre software for accessibility assessment > <http://www.Tanaguru.org/> > KBAccess collaborative database of good and bad examples of Web > Accessibility <http://www.kbaccess.org/> > > This transmission may contain information that is privileged, > confidential, legally privileged, and/or exempt from disclosure under > applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby > notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the > information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is > STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Although this transmission and any attachments > are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect > any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the > responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no > responsibility is accepted by JPMorgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries > and affiliates, as applicable, for any loss or damage arising in any > way from its use. If you received this transmission in error, please > immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its > entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. > -- Phone: +33 9 72 11 26 06 Mobile: +33 6 73 96 79 59 Twitter: @mfaure <http://twitter.com/mfaure> Tanaguru free-libre software for accessibility assessment <http://www.Tanaguru.org/> KBAccess collaborative database of good and bad examples of Web Accessibility <http://www.kbaccess.org/>
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 07:20:11 UTC