Re: On Focus Question

James,
SC 3.2.1 is triggered not on input / altering state of control but on focus.
So for instance, if a popup is launched even as you tab to a link ...
not activate the link, a non sighted user may not even realize
something has changed. Sometimes even a new window opens up when one
tabs to a link. This is violation of SC 3.2.1

Changing the selection in a drop down that triggers a change in page's
content as one tabs out or even when one is trying to navigate through
the options in the drop down is a case of SC 3.2.2
This is the case even when auto-tab is turned on  that causes the
focus to jump to the next field as soon as one enters text into an
edit field. ... this unexpected change of contex on inputt
Sailesh Panchang


On 5/22/13, Homme, James <james.homme@highmark.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm looking at 3.2.1 On Focus
> When any component receives focus, it does not initiate a change of context.
> (Level A)
>
> Here's what I'm thinking. If I press an arrow key while focus is in a drop
> down, focus does go to another list item, and the page does change before I
> get to pick the item I want. In that situation, this is a violation. If
> instead, I get focus to the box and press Alt + Down Arrow, I can scroll
> through the box at will and pick my choice. Then, I can tab out of the box
> and that initiates a change on the page. My question is this. Is this only a
> violation because I may not know that I can use Alt + Down Arrow, or is it a
> violation for some other reason. I realize that in a normal Windows dialog
> box, plain arrow keys don't initiate a change.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jim
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> This e-mail and any attachments to it are confidential and are intended
> solely for use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If
> you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately
> and then delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not
> keep, use, disclose, copy or distribute this e-mail without the author's
> prior permission. The views expressed in this e-mail message do not
> necessarily represent the views of Highmark Inc., its subsidiaries, or
> affiliates.
>

Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2013 13:37:10 UTC