- From: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 02:33:26 -0700
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 4 July 2012 09:34:00 UTC
On Jul 2, 2012, at 2:29 AM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > I have published a draft of a practical guide for developers: > Using ARIA in HTML > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/aria-unofficial/raw-file/tip/index.html > > feedback welcome! I think this heading is a little confusing: Use default ARIA semantics? Does a NO here mean it doesn't use the default semantics? If so, what does that even mean? Perhaps you meant to call it "Use additional ARIA semantics" or something to that effect. I might instead phrase it: Should authors explicitly define ARIA attributes and/or role? You might note *why* you said YES on form. I assume it's because of the ARIA landmark benefit. Ditto for other landmarks like nav/navigation, etc. Looks good. Thanks for putting this together.
Received on Wednesday, 4 July 2012 09:34:00 UTC