Re: Text-to-speech feature: a real help ?

yes that site is fine for folks like us, familiar with the WAI and it's 
way of doing things.   But that site would overwhelme the average user, 
not to mention someone new to adaptive technology.

probably needs to be layered with only what that person selects showing on 
the screen.

Bob



On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:

> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:06:12 +0000
> From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
> To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Text-to-speech feature: a real help ?
> Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:06:49 +0000
> Resent-From: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> 
> On 21/02/2012 17:01, Christophe Strobbe wrote:
>> Do you mean something like this
>> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/adaptive/strategies.html>?
>
> Not to be too critical, but: how bad is that page, in terms of actual design? 
> All text - very dense copy at that - with no images, diagrams, screenshots, 
> etc, and let's be honest a horrid overall look and feel...not the friendliest 
> place where I'd send somebody that has problems with browsing the web.
>
> But yes, something like that.
>
> P
> -- 
> Patrick H. Lauke
> ______________________________________________________________
> re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
> [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
>
> www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
> http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/
> ______________________________________________________________
> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
> ______________________________________________________________
>