W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2012

any suggested alternatives to accessible version

From: Roger Hudson <rhudson@usability.com.au>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 15:36:51 +1100
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <006701ccec64$9b2f6100$d18e2300$@com.au>


>From previous research I know that many web users do not understand what the
term "accessible" means when it comes to web content. This appears to be
particularly the case with older users of the web.


I am trying to come up with options for the wording of a link to an
accessible version of a page (or application). Desperate to see if there is
anything better than "accessible version".


Any ideas or suggestions?






Roger Hudson

Web Usability

Mobile: 0405 320 014

Phone: 02 9568 1535

Web: www.usability.com.au

Blog: www.dingoaccess.com

Twitter: http://twitter.com/rogerhudson

Email: rhudson@usability.com.au


Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 04:38:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:36:38 UTC