- From: Phil Evans <pae9@star.le.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 07:52:17 +0100
- To: flybynight <isforums@manx.net>
- Cc: 'Terry Dean' <Terry.Dean@chariot.net.au>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Hi all, Just a very small contribution, as I don't use CMS at all: > As does Plone which also looks very good. Is this true? I have not used Plone from the developer point of view, but a website which I visit regularly uses Plone. If I feed pages frmo that website to the W3C HTML validator they fail -- only a couple of relatively minor errors, but nonetheless I (naively?) would hope that a CMS which aspires to serve accessible content will at least provide valid content. As a side issue, which you're probably all aware of, no CMS could ever guarantee accessibilty on its own. For example, a (plone-based) site I have used chose red on green as its colour scheme; ignoring that fact that red/green colour-blindness (very common) would render the page unusable! Phil > > Typo3 would seem to be quite usable apparently although I haven't spent any > time looking into this at this stage. > > However, you may well want to take a look at contao: http://www.contao.org > > Which looks very good from my initial view. > > I haven't validated it yet but it seemed very usable with only the keyboard > and has a nice clean and simple interface, while still having all the > features you'd expect to see in a leading CMS. It even has a load of > shortcut keys that are described in the main admin screen. You can try the > online demo from their home page. > > I'd be interested to hear what you and others think? > > Incidentally, have you looked at DNN recently? I'm guessing it hasn't got > any better but I do know they were keen on conformance with W3C guidelines, > although which ones I'm not exactly sure. > > Cheers > Ian > > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf > Of Terry Dean > Sent: 03 August 2011 21:14 > To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > Subject: Re: Accessible content management system > > Hi Ian, > > If you do find one that conforms to the W3C Web Accessibility guidelines > please let me know. Its one thing to claim that a CMS is compliant and > another to actually be accessible. > > You only need to run a few accessibility tools over these CMSs to find that > they are generally full of problems. > > I dont claim to have the answers and I do not build these systems but I can > understand how difficult they must be to make compliant. I remember trying > to modify DotNetNuke in 2000 in order to validate it to XHTML Strict 1.0 and > gave up in the end. > > regards, > > Terry > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ian Sharpe"<isforums@manx.net> > To: "'Terry Dean'"<Terry.Dean@chariot.net.au>;<w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> > Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 6:32 PM > Subject: RE: Accessible content management system > > >> Hi Terry >> >> While I understand where you're coming from and based on the feedback I've >> received so far, would accept your belief that at this time, such a >> solution >> does not exist, I would challenge your statement that this is not a >> serious >> question. >> >> Much of the web these days is generated through CMSs and this is only >> going >> to increase over time. One of the founding principals of the web for me at >> least is giving everyone the opportunity to have their say and hear what >> everyone else is saying. It follows that if members of the disabled or >> less >> technically competant communities are unable to voice their opinions and >> thoughts as easily as those without any barriers to access and author >> content (particularly when it's in relation to accessing and authoring >> content), this voice will become quieter when it should be getting louder. >> >> Ensuring that there is at least one accessible and feature rich CMS would >> therefore seem vital in terms of the web's accessibility to me. >> >> It is therefore a very serious question and while there doesn't appear to >> currently be a single solution, I hope that you are at least encouraged, >> even if only a little, by the comments others have made. >> >> Cheers >> ian > > > -- ------------------------- Phil Evans, Swift Development Scientist X-ray and Observational Astronomy Group, University of Leicester Tel: +44 (0)116 252 5059 Mobile: +44 (0)7780 980240 pae9@star.le.ac.uk http://www.star.le.ac.uk/~pae9 http://www.swift.ac.uk Follow me as a Swift scientist on Twitter: @swift_phil http://www.star.le.ac.uk/~pae9/twitter
Received on Thursday, 4 August 2011 06:53:04 UTC