- From: Cindy Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 18:02:47 -0400
- To: John Baab <john.baab@gmail.com>
- CC: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Exactly.. I posted something *very* similar on an ADA Laws listserv earlier today regarding just this case.. I have at hand a very lightweight computer setup yet it is not out of the realm of feasibilities that I, or someone like me, could reproduce the website in question accessibly with that extremely limited resource if given time to study, self-teach what markup would correct it.. It's just NOT THAT HARD if one is truly invested in any given project at hand....... My point in saying the above is that here we are talking about a multi-multi-multi dollar corporation that can afford enviable web development resources equally capable of coding accessibly, not just my little $50 setup.. Now, I'm meandering ahead to someone possibly suggesting that their website errors and omissions, in particular those that directly affect accessibility, are the inevitable result of a design necessary to produce instantaneous, ever varying feedback for, say, product availability, pricing, etc.. In reflecting upon having seen past requests and responses regarding the Validator and certain markup [languages], anyone who has spent any amount of time around validators, compliance, et al, knows that there aren't many things that can't be fixed, marked up *somehow* to [validate] upon output to the [screen], thus, by default, quickly, easily insuring immediate better accessibility, *IF* one is, again, invested enough in a project to do the finger work it takes to learn the same (from any number of *f_r_e_e* resources available online no less).. Admittedly my experience, and thus, insight remain limited alongside some of you all so I'm sure there may exist circumstances that *might* be very difficult to ever validate to the "green".. The thing in this case is that, on a random validation earlier today, the homepage for the Target website in question returned 556 errors, errors that potentially could negatively affect accessibility unto themselves, first gander revealing many recognizable as immediately correctable simply with a few quick strokes of the keyboard.. My very humble O.. :) Cindy Sue - :: - http://360.yahoo.com/Mountain_Splash http://sixalmostseven.butterflybytes.com Georgia Voices That Count, 2005 Talking Rock, GA, USA John Baab wrote: <snip> I just don't understand how so many people can have a problem with coding their webpages the correct way. I mentioned this at work today and got nothing but resistance from everyone around, people need to get over the fact that they don't actually do their job correctly, learn the correct way and quit being so defensive about it.
Received on Friday, 8 September 2006 21:38:42 UTC