Re: How do you deal with false claims of accessibility conformance?

> There are legal teeth, 

I'm not so sure. After the attempt to enforce conformance via a terse
letter has failed, what next?
I'll bet that's a big grey area, unless the W3C wish to enter into the
arena of litigation,arbitration, and other sundry joys.

> they aren't that hard to apply at least to most governments and large companies 

Really? And I don't wish to appear abrupt, but I just don't believe that.
I do believe, as I am sure most of us do, that all governments should,
by default, be stepping up to the plate to serve their clients (the
public) and large corporations should also lead the way with models of
best practice, accessible services etc.

When useless ineffectual legislation fails to deliver, my hope is that
good will on the part of government/corporations will be the instrument
that brokers change. That combined with sound development practice and
examples of accessible systems
vastly outshining what has gone before.

>> Would the design of their own conformance logo add to the possible
>> conformance "Tower of babel"?
> It would, and that of course is the risk. On the other hand, if they were
> more active it would help improve trust in the real label. 

Well that is the worry, the symbols are loosing their glow and their
currency is being sadly devalued.



NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments 
is confidential and may be privileged.  If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of 
the content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify 
the sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to 
delete it and any attachments from your system.

NCBI endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated 
by its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants.  However, 
it cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are 
transmitted.  We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email 
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent the views of NCBI


Received on Sunday, 3 September 2006 18:57:02 UTC