- From: Jesper Tverskov <jesper@tverskov.dk>
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:39:15 +0200
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Hi list I have published an article, "The benefits of footnotes in webpages", http://www.smackthemouse.com/footnotes. It discusses a lot of accessibility issues. Would you agree that even though the superscript of a footnote index number is presentational in nature, the footnote being a footnote also without superscript, it is correct to use the sup XHTML element instead of just the span element and CSS? Any webdesigner would find it natural to use the sup element not just for let us say mathematical and chemical notation where it is needed but also for the footnote index number. If there is no space in between a word and a following footnote, the sup element could make it a little easier for screen readers to tell them apart than if the span element is used. Do you also agree that the title attribute is almost 99% bad from an accessibility point of view as implemented in today's browsers? That the browsers must come up with something better? Other comments to the article are welcome. Please help me improve it. Best regards, Jesper Tverskov www.smackthemouse.com
Received on Monday, 28 August 2006 13:39:44 UTC