- From: Brian Kelly <webfocus@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 07:49:36 +0100
- To: "John Foliot" <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
- Cc: "Sailesh Panchang" <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- Message-ID: <a61176f50607252349o1d7e32xfeb7b2860463f5ed@mail.gmail.com>
This thread reminds me that back in 1998 I gave a brief presentation at a WAI meeting held in Toronto on "Accessibility, Automation and Metadata" - see http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/accessibility/metadata/www8/ I suggested that metadata could help with the automated processing of resources to enhance accessibility e.g. I'm looking for details of a restaurant in Toronto and any listing will do as long as it's accessible. I suggested that the metadata could be produced by automated tools (e.gknowledge of the formats; etc.), by the author or by the community. Possibly the Google accessible search service oculd build on some of these ideas. Brian On 7/25/06, John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu> wrote: > > > Sailesh Panchang wrote: > > Also one needs to be aware that being listed in > > Google's accessibility search is not a certification of having > > attained conformance when that is a legal necessity. > > Yes, I have some real concerns that this initiative will be used for less > than honorable reasons, such as the one Sailesh pointed out. Just because > a > site ranks in this "new" Accessible Google does not for an instant mean > that > it meets any specific guideline or mandate, any more than having a Bobby > icon on your site means it is accessible. > > I watch with a wary eye... > > JF > > > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Brian Kelly UK Web Focus UKOLN University of Bath BATH, UK
Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2006 06:49:46 UTC