- From: Julian Scarlett <Julian.Scarlett@eden.gov.uk>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:34:34 +0100
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Orion Adrian > Sent: 25 July 2006 15:14 > To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > Subject: Re: User friendly 404s reconsidered > > > > On 7/25/06, David Poehlman > <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com> wrote: > > > > Watching this thread, something comes to mind which may have been > > considered. How about a list of closest matches? > > As long as you don't automatically redirect (don't take > control from the user), it might be a good idea. But there > should be a threshold. You probably should give them close > matches, not the 5 closest matches, if that makes sense. > I may be missing the point here but how do you provide a closest match given that all you know of is the requested URI? For CMS driven sites this may just be a page ID. Julian This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email Security System on behalf of Eden District Council . For more information on a proactive email security service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
Received on Tuesday, 25 July 2006 14:37:15 UTC