W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2006

RE: User friendly 404s reconsidered

From: Julian Scarlett <Julian.Scarlett@eden.gov.uk>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:34:34 +0100
Message-ID: <9DC70EEAAFAE154AAA19F676DA93D122268B0D@EDENMAIL.eden.gov.uk>
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Orion Adrian
> Sent: 25 July 2006 15:14
> To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> Subject: Re: User friendly 404s reconsidered
> On 7/25/06, David Poehlman 
> <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com> wrote:
> >
> > Watching this thread, something comes to mind which may have been 
> > considered.  How about a list of closest matches?
> As long as you don't automatically redirect (don't take 
> control from the user), it might be a good idea. But there 
> should be a threshold. You probably should give them close 
> matches, not the 5 closest matches, if that makes sense.
I may be missing the point here but how do you provide a closest match given that all you know of is the requested URI? For CMS driven sites this may just be a page ID.


This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
 Security System on behalf of Eden District Council . For more information on a proactive email security service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
Received on Tuesday, 25 July 2006 14:37:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:36:28 UTC