- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 22:47:52 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
- CC: wai-ig list <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
karl@w3.org wrote: > Hi, > This is a QA Review comment for "CSS3 Advanced Layout Module" > http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-layout-20051215/ > 2005-12-15 > 1st WD > > About http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-layout-20051215/ > > We don't know if the WG has made the request for an accessibility review, but we were wondering if it could cause any accessibility problems. as reordering the flow of information inside the file and rendered on screen. If not done, please coordinate with WAI. Not sure if we're meant to comment on this, but I'd say: it doesn't cause an accessibility issue, *unless* the author is relying on a particular visual positioning to suggest or create a relationship necessary to the understanding of the content, but which is not present in the original document itself (i.e. it doesn't make sense, or has a different meaning altogether, with styles turned off). P -- Patrick H. Lauke __________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com __________________________________________________________ Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ __________________________________________________________
Received on Friday, 21 July 2006 21:48:03 UTC