- From: Carlos A Velasco <Carlos.Velasco@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 21:08:31 +0100
- To: Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Hi Chris, UWEM is a methodology, not a test suite. The concept of test under UWEM refers more to a "how-to" apply WCAG 1.0, and what a tool or a human tester would need to check for (X)HTML and CSS. For test suites, as we have discussed earlier today in the ERT call, there is a WCAG 2.0 test suite which will be publicly available under the scope of the BenToWeb project <http://bentoweb.org/>. regards, carlos Chris Ridpath wrote: > Hi Carlos, > > I'm happy to see that your group is trying to develop a unified method > of evaluating web content for accessibility. > > It appears that many, if not all, of the HTML tests used in your > methodology are similar to the tests in the W3C test suite. I wonder if > we could coordinate our efforts and come up with a single test suite. Or > perhaps we could create a document that maps the one test suite to the > other. > > For example, your WAB test "1.1_HTML_01" seems to map to W3C tests: > > all image elements have an alt attribute > http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/tests/test1.html > all area elements have an alt attribute > http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/tests/test64.html > all input elements, type of image, have an alt attribute > http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/tests/test58.html > > There are a few differences but I think we could sort them out. -- Dr Carlos A Velasco - http://access.fit.fraunhofer.de/ Fraunhofer-Institut für Angewandte Informationstechnik FIT [Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT)] Barrierefreie Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologie für Alle Schloss Birlinghoven, D53757 Sankt Augustin (Germany) Tel: +49-2241-142609 Fax: +49-2241-1442609
Received on Wednesday, 21 December 2005 20:08:44 UTC