- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:11:43 +0000 (GMT)
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> david, sorry, but i am having a hard time understanding what you're > actually getting to. "skip to" are internal links, are they not? what is > the alternative? how can you define what is content and what is As I see it, he is saying that links should be noun phrases, but "skip" is a verb. I think he is also saying that the beiginning of the real content is not the only point in the document that people want to go to quickly.
Received on Monday, 14 February 2005 21:54:40 UTC