- From: Tina Holmboe <tina@greytower.net>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:08:00 +0100 (CET)
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On 14 Feb, david poehlman wrote: > I learn as I go. It's good tat you can use css but suppose I decide I > want to put it on tape. Never mind this road. Anchors have been > around longer than te wai and if judicious use of internal anchors is > made, skip to anything is not needed. Indeed they have - which is why the controversy surrounding this issue confuses me. There is really no difference, in principle or in practice, between a "table of contents" link and a "main content" link. Both internal, both within the standards, both used exactly as internal links are meant to be used. Perfect. As for the need - yes, there will *always* be a need for internal anchors to skip between various sections of a document - UNLESS, of course, we decide to predefine a number of a types of sections a document can have. Sortof not the new-fangled XML-type method, that. -- - Tina Holmboe Greytower Technologies tina@greytower.net http://www.greytower.net/ [+46] 0708 557 905
Received on Monday, 14 February 2005 14:45:14 UTC