- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:26:03 +0000
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
david poehlman wrote: > If I have lynx set up to have links and formfields numbered, every link is > easily accessible by typing its number and pressing enter. Skip to is > useless to lynx. not to sound flippant, but: just because *you* use the numbered links and formfields, it doesn't mean that it's useless for *all* lynx users. > Skip to begs the question over all because it sets asside > good page structure. ok, so...good page structure: main navigation / page-specific sub navigation (e.g. related pages) / main content / footer imagine now that the main navigation has, say, 10 links, and the sub navigation another 5 or so. to get to the content, users have to tab through the 15 links first. or are we talking about keeping the navigation in a discrete element (e.g. an unordered list) that the user can skip using the browser's / AT's functions? -- Patrick H. Lauke _____________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com
Received on Monday, 14 February 2005 15:24:46 UTC