- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:01:06 +0300
- To: "John Colby" <John.Colby@uce.ac.uk>, WAI-IG <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Adding opinion... Captioning things is something that is learned. If you watch captions a lot you discover that lots of real-time captions in particular aren't very good either. (And aren't likely to improve magically - understanding and transcribing something in real time correctly just isn't something that gets done perfectly all the time even by experts). There are some tricks - knowing what sound effects are relevant being an obvious one. The tools for doing these things are improving, and although I can't claim to be a great caption editor, I have produced Spanish-captioned (as opposed to subtitled) versions of short flash presentations to a standard I would describe as "useful" rather than "excellent". (Why do I love SMIL? Because multi-lingual captioning is easy, and adding sign language interpretation is, too). There is, of course, a lot more to accessible flash presentations than captions and audio description. Ensuring that a flash presentation of a bit of software allows the user to recognise the real software when they come across it, for example. This isn't often the case when people are using a screen reader to access the presentation at the moment. But the captioning and description bit are at least something identifiable as a need. They do take some real effort and time to learn, and while I am prepared to use my captions and descriptions in place of nothing, I would rather have a professional do the job for me... cheers Chaals On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:51:51 +0100, John Colby <John.Colby@uce.ac.uk> wrote: > This is an opinion: > > If you treat Flash movies in exactly the same way that TV producers are > having to treat broadcast TV programmes, with (switchable) subtitles and > (switchable) audio description, then that's the only way we're going to > get accessibility in Flash as it stands. > > However I've been told by those that supposedly know that this is far > too difficult for amateurs. So I'm going ahead anyway with 'accessible' > teaching videos and see where I fall over. > > That's this summer's research taken care of, anyway - and probably next > year's as well.
Received on Monday, 28 June 2004 06:01:40 UTC