- From: Liddy Nevile <Liddy.Nevile@motile.net>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 21:53:43 +1000
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
- Cc: andy@andyheath.org.uk, WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
so what else? please explain. I have already noted that I agree with everyone talking about navigation and that it is good to have metadata that describes links etc but that is not the sort of metadata I was worrying about .... should I be? Liddy On Tuesday, July 1, 2003, at 06:49 PM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > Well, I like it as far as it goes. It seems the scope is a little > different - it covers what should be added to common DC practice, and > I like what it says. > > I think there are some additional things that are useful in > Accessibility - some of the things that are already common in the > Dublin Core community and possibly some that are more strongly tied to > the fact that things are on the Web (As I understand it, Dublin Core > is meant to be usable for things that are not on the Web, so those > things won't fit into DC easily as far as I can tell). > > cheers > > Chaals > > On Tuesday, Jul 1, 2003, at 02:24 Europe/Zurich, Liddy Nevile wrote: > >> >> Can I expose my thinking and see how people react to it? >> >> It is set out briefly at http://www.ozewai.org/liddy/20030701.html >> >> Liddy >> >> > -- > Charles McCathieNevile Fundación Sidar > charles@sidar.org http://www.sidar.org > >
Received on Tuesday, 1 July 2003 07:53:49 UTC