- From: Isofarro <w3evangelism@faqportal.uklinux.net>
- Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 12:58:31 +0100
- To: "Scarlett Julian \(ED\)" <Julian.Scarlett@sheffield.gov.uk>, "'Angela Hilton'" <angela.hilton@umist.ac.uk>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
From: Scarlett Julian (ED) Subject: RE: Javascript > I generally use my browser (currently Opera 7.1) with javascript disabled so if I visited > a site with menus that you're talking about I'd be stuck. Unless of course you provided > text-only equivalent links but then what's the point - may as well make the first set > accessible in the first place. (IMO) The point is that dynamic dropdown menus (DHTML) improve the look and feel of a website site, allowing you to have more navigational scope without overpowering the visitor with options. The moment you say "you might as well just have text-only links" is the same moment when web designers see accessibility as nothing more than text-only websites - you are only advocating the myth some of us are working hard to dispell. Recall that accessibility is about providing _alternatives_ to non-textual or dynamic content where practical - not _replacing_ them with text-only non-dynamic components. Naturally in the case of DHTML menus, there is a graceful fallback in the noscript element, so a DHTML menu can be accessible by providing an alternative. Mike.
Received on Thursday, 1 May 2003 08:05:32 UTC