- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 23:32:39 +0100 (BST)
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> Normally, the clause is based around their own development standards (which > may or may not include accessibility). Failure to meet their standards would That's different from what was described. In the case of the development standards, the bidder has the option of looking at them before they price the bid. They probably won't, because all such standards are much of a muchness, so the cost of compliance is fairly predictable. A customer's accessiblity standards are not something that most suppliers will be familar with, so they ought to request them up front. However, in this case, the rules can be set after the fact, and there isn't much precedent about what a reasonable accessibility auditor would require.
Received on Thursday, 24 April 2003 18:40:44 UTC