RE: Accessibility and web developer contracts

Jon Hanna wrote ...

> An important thing here is that you have the standards to which you will
> expected to comply available before you begin. Otherwise it will be
> impossible to work to that requirement, especially in this particular
> since one organisations accessibility standards might be in direct
> contradiction to another's.

In principal this will be WCAG A, and it will be stated in the contract.
However, I need to think a bit more about this. Much of the content is
likely to be map based. I can't think how  to write a text equivalent for a
map (referenced via longdesc or otherwise), since different users will look
at a map and extract different content from it, and hence by definition, one
user's "text equivalent" of a map won't be the same as another's. 

The devil, as always, is in the detail!


"Internet Communications are not necessarily secure, and therefore Salisbury
District Council does not accept legal responsibility for the contents
of this message. Any views or opinions presented are those of the author and
do not necessarily represent those of Salisbury District Council.
Anyone replying by email to the author of this message (or emailing anyone
else, using the "" address), is advised that such emails
may be read by persons other than the intended recipient"

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:

Received on Thursday, 24 April 2003 10:37:25 UTC