Exploiting Bobby (was RE: Alternative validation tools.)

• From: Timothy J. Luoma <lists@tntluoma.com>
• Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 08:01:28 -0800 (PST)
• To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
• Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.51.0212191801080.17844@localhost.localdomain>

> Bobby at CAST had had the same limitation for the reasons Chuck
> Mentioned: hackers abusing the free online Bobby rather than paying $99.

Interesting that the W3C has been able to keep both the CSS and HTML
validators online, up and running (with few exceptions) without these same
problems.

I'm willing to bet they see more traffic than Bobby.

So why does Bobby have such trouble?  It is that much more intensive?

TjL

Received on Saturday, 21 December 2002 10:58:51 UTC