RE: Ironic accessibility

> > Might I suggest instead that we say:  "Accessible to any user
> regardless of
> > what type of technology they may be using.  This includes, but is not
>
> The problem with the general definition is it also includes people with
> limited hardware because they live in countries where there is little
> disposal income to attract the web site authors

Well a problem with proselytising accessibility, a benefit with accessible
sites.

Of course anyone who's looked at global economics knows that milking such
countries for all you can get is a very profitable move - though promoting
that viewpoint to management is kinda dancing with the devil.

Received on Thursday, 12 December 2002 06:29:01 UTC