- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 20:50:36 +0000 (GMT)
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> I'm less sure about the value of having URIs automatically save to a file. > To my mind if the content-disposition header is "attachment" the user should > still be given the option to open it directly (unless it's of a file type > that security settings prohibit direct opening). Files that are security risks should not be automatically saved, except possibly to a specially quarantined directory (but the browser cache is half way to that, anyway).
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2002 01:39:41 UTC