- From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 14:37:44 -0500
- To: Harry Woodrow <harrry@email.com>, "'Access Systems'" <accessys@smart.net>, "'Scarlett Julian (ED)'" <Julian.Scarlett@sheffield.gov.uk>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
I only refer to two types of pdf files and those are tagged and untagged pdf documents. Even the taggged ones are not "accessible" in the sense that they need to be or in the sense that html can be if it is propperly coded. This cuts down on the confusion. In order to create a tagged pdf document, one must make a consious effort to do so. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Harry Woodrow" <harrry@email.com> To: "'Access Systems'" <accessys@smart.net>; "'Scarlett Julian (ED)'" <Julian.Scarlett@sheffield.gov.uk> Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 10:27 AM Subject: RE: Accessible PDFs? Maybe we should define what me mean by pdf. Pdf is not one but several file formats all having the one extension. Pdf files can be created by scanning documents, in which case the document is more like an image and hence is inherently inaccessible. In older pdfs they may be converted from word or other documents and these may be accessible to some degree as the text is able to be accessed under some circumstances. If they are prepared in Adobe Acrobat 5 by scanning they are inaccessible. If they are prepared in Acrobat 5 and marked up correctly or distilled in the latest format they may be accessible. If they are prepared even in acrobat 5 and then distilled using an older type of format, as are many print prepared documents because many print shops can't handle the latest converters they will not be accessible. So can some knowledgeable person suggest a way we can refer to they myriad of pdf files in a way in which we can all know which we are referring to. Harry Woodrow -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Access Systems Sent: Monday, 2 December 2002 11:13 PM To: Scarlett Julian (ED) Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: RE: Accessible PDFs? On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Scarlett Julian (ED) wrote: > that's a less than useful answer in that it doesn't really give a true > picture of the situation. Yes, it's true that AT cannot read pdf documents > created using Acrobat 4 but (correct me if I'm wrong) it *is* possible using > version 5 to produce documents that are accessible if the creator knows what > they're doing. AND the user has the conversion software AND is running the "correct" operating system, AND the user is using the "correct" webrowser. show me how it will ever work no matter how good the creator is if the user does not buy the conversion software or is not running Windoze or is not using IE give me a site to view that you think has accessible pdf and I'll try reading it, I sincerely wish you were right, but haven't found it yet. Bob ASCII Ribbon Campaign accessBob NO HTML/PDF/RTF in e-mail accessys@smartnospam.net NO MSWord docs in e-mail Access Systems, engineers NO attachments in e-mail, *LINUX powered* access is a civil right *#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*# *#*#*# THIS message and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be privileged. They are intended ONLY for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, Please notify the sender as soon as possible. Please DO NOT READ, COPY, USE, or DISCLOSE this communication to others and DELETE it from your computer systems. Thanks --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.423 / Virus Database: 238 - Release Date: 25/11/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.423 / Virus Database: 238 - Release Date: 25/11/2002
Received on Monday, 2 December 2002 14:40:24 UTC