- From: Jim Thatcher <jim@jimthatcher.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:53:01 -0600
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- Cc: Michael Burks <mburks952@worldnet.att.net>
I really don't know why I subscribe to this list. The behavior of a few of its members is typified by the responses to Mike Burks' offering of Steve Jacobs' article on the "Business Benefits of Access-for-All Design." Eight messages responding to Mike's message and not ONE, repeat, not one, message which was on topic. I know there are lots of folks who subscribe to this list. Do you all appreciate this nit-picking. Am I in fact the only one who is the odd-ball-out, who is sick of the process that typifies this list? Jim Accessibility Consulting http://jimthatcher.com 512-306-0931 508 Web accessibility Tutorial: http://jimthatcher.com/webcourse1.htm -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of David Woolley Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 3:22 PM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Re: Business Benefits of Access-for-All Design > > The HTTP headers are as follows. Note that they clearly say that it The HTML is also broken, as you might expect from Front Page. It's got p within b, and, of course, a lot of presentational markup.
Received on Wednesday, 27 November 2002 19:56:43 UTC