- From: lynn alford <lynn.alford@jcu.edu.au>
- Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:08:57 +1000
- To: W3c_Access <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
At 09:37 AM 14/11/2002 +0200, Jukka Korpela wrote: >Jim Byrne wrote: > > > Please use the page at http://www.mcu.org.uk/campaigns/accessible.html >- - > > Please add your great looking and accessible site to the > > list; make it easy for other to find a list of well designed > > and accessible sites. > >I have become more and more convinced of the need for galleries >of accessible sites that have other good properties as well, >in order to meet some of the very common arguments and prejudices I would like to see some sort of review process for sites submitted. Open invitations to post your site are open to abuse, I recently cleared my guestbook of a couple of urls that lead to German porn sites. I don't really want a guestbook full of such urls. Good looking sites is more than a bit subjective, things like content, navigation consistency and so forth should be considered as well. I submitted my site mostly because it follows all of the basics of accessible design in being valid html, valid css, consistent navigation and when styles are off, the navigation *follows* the content instead of proceeding it. I am guilty of writing some very long pages though. Lynn -- lynn.alford@deletethis.pibweb.com The Programmer in Black http://www.pibweb.com/
Received on Thursday, 14 November 2002 18:11:47 UTC