- From: Jon Hanna <jon@spin.ie>
- Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 12:40:22 -0000
- To: "wai-ig list" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> > This seems a reasonable practical response to the > > reality of there being a large number of inaccessible > > pages and practices in use. > > I don't think it's necessarily a good strategy. > It depends. If the future necessity and current desirability of higher level compliance is borne in mind when doing the first "pass" it can be a useful part of the process of deciding strategy, many AA or AAA improvements can then be done in the first stage of improvement. If it's done in a more mechanical way of first ONLY doing A work and then AA work then it is indeed a flawed strategy. In other words I think the WAI prioritisation is a useful tool in deciding on the local and mutable prioritisation scheme you describe.
Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2002 07:34:26 UTC